1. Yet ,, in genealogy, all of us knowthat each code there clearly was an exemption. An effective vexing part ofgenealogy is the fact no body most understands just how to apply the brand new exceptions orrules with one decisive adjective instance usually, possibly, probably,almost certainly, etc. It might be fascinating in the event the here almost every other examples ofjointures being made a-year or a couple immediately after a well-known marriage date.
2. Could there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation for the matrimony away from ElizabethClifford and you will Sir Ralph Bowes have been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or next cousins, after taken off brand new 5th LordClifford? Who would restrict their relationship day.
Arthur
Allegedly, when the a dispensation are tried and you may supplied, it can havebeen by the among adopting the, that can appear in the fresh new correspondingregister book, if it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out-of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop regarding Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop off York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Whether your tenth Lord Clifford really does wed in early 1487 [state January] andhas Elizabeth later on in that season, do this new chronology perhaps not functions?
John possession?
Elizabeth produced inside the late 1487, Henry born in 1488/nine, Joan from inside the ,an such like. filling out the latest labels of post regarding . If the (a) thechronology nevertheless functions; and you will (b) their unique relationships part was not reasonable; thenwe simply have the newest 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s which is into the oppositionto the brand new conjecture you to she try a legitimate child.
six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Could be the Clifford daughters new onlyknown Henry VII connections omitted? Are there someone else? In this case https://kissbrides.com/hr/estonske-nevjeste/,would not you to mirror badly about this document as the a source?
From evaluations You will find made of the c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith the brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of your Northern pedigrees, that are
On the c.1505 Connections pedigrees, this new Clifford youngsters are perhaps not listedin a beneficial Clifford pedigree, but instead in the St. John pedigree. While the I’mnot familiar with this new St. John relatives, following the ‘s the recommendations asit looks from the c.1505 pedigree, given that obtained from the new 1834 Coll. Top. etGen. post. The new phrasing inside the quotations is strictly whilst seems inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
„Zero. XII.“Off my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.“f.288, 296, 317, 318.“Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset had about three husbands.“ Of the „John Duke ofSomerset“ she got „My Woman the fresh King’s Mommy.“ that has „New Queen.“ whohad „Prince „Of the „Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest partner.“ she had step three daus & dos sons:
A great. „Edith, married in order to Geoffrey Pole away from Buckinghamshire.“ That they had:A1. „Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded into the Woman Margaret, dau. off theDuke out of Clarence.“ That they had: „Harry. „A2. „Alianor, wedded so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.“ They’d: „John Verney.–– [child, unnamed]. ––-[an alternate youngster, unnamed].“
B. „John Ssint John, esq.“ He previously four children:B1. „Sir John Saint John, Knight.“ that has „Four daughters and you will oneson.“B2. „Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.“ They had „Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.“B3. „E, wedded to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. out-of Lincolnshire.“B4. „An excellent Nun away from Shaftesbury.“B5. „Oliver Saint John.“
C. „Dame Mary, wedded so you’re able to Sir Richard Frognall.“ They had:C1. „Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and you will sistren.“ Which have issueindicated, not named.C2. „Age, wedded to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.“
D. „Age, wedded very first into the Lord Zouche; shortly after towards the LordScrope regarding Bolton.“ Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche] “ Catesby.“ That they had:“Elizabeth. George. John. William.“D2. [of the Scrope] “ Conyers.“ Having issueindicated although not entitled.
Margaret Duchess off Somerset, by „Lionel Lord Welles, history husband.“had: „John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out-of K. Edward IV.“ andthey had „Elizabeth.“
